creator safety · stalker & NCII — methodology
a creator whose material was copied without consent has an intellectual property and safety case. the forensic question is the same as for any other professional whose work was taken: who copied what, when, to which platform, through what mechanism. the relevant artifacts are file metadata, dmca notice timestamps, cdn distribution chains, payment-processor deplatforming records, and account-creation patterns. the examiner works from logs, notices, account exports, and file metadata (hashes, exif, provenance scores) — not from replaying or judging the media. onlyfans, fansly, manyvids, chaturbate, clip sites — examiners who serve other professionals do not audit whether they approve of the work. this page does not either. the question is evidentiary: what can be established, from what record, to what standard. takedown kits and case reports assume the creator supplied exports they control as the rights-holder. all tools run locally. no file leaves the device. no upload, no account. start with evidence manifest and doxxing victim investigation kit.
what this page is not
- not subscriber or client identification — no tool here surveils buyers, tips, or anonymous clients.
- not content review or moral judgment — parsers work on metadata, notices, and exports the creator chooses to provide.
- not legal advice on fosta-sesta or platform terms — counsel who understands the space is required.
- not a guarantee platforms will remove content — documentation supports counsel and notices, not platform policy outcomes.
operational security
before running any of these tools: use a device and browser profile the person harassing or stalking you does not control. a private or incognito window does not protect against device-level monitoring — use a separate device if the threat model includes spyware or shared accounts. these tools run entirely in the browser. no file leaves the device — open devtools and watch the network tab to verify. the tools here are for evidence preservation and documentation. for immediate safety planning, platform account recovery, attorney referral, or harm reduction support, contact one of the organizations below — they are equipped for that in ways a browser tool is not.
trusted organizations
- SWOP USA — peer support, harm reduction, and legal referral — does not provide direct forensic parsing.
- Cyber Civil Rights Initiative — NCII crisis helpline 1-844-878-2274 · removal resources · attorney referral network.
- EFF Surveillance Self-Defense — device and account security under active surveillance — relevant for stalking and doxxing components.
- National Center for Victims of Crime — VictimConnect 1-855-484-2846 — general stalking and harassment referral; no position on occupation.
- Sex Workers Project / Urban Justice Center — legal services for sex workers — national referral; capacity limited.
the first 10 minutes
- use a device and browser profile the harasser or stalker does not control — not a shared or spyware-monitored phone.
- hash every export, notice pdf, and dm dump with evidence-manifest-generator before counsel review.
- inventory doxxing exposure with doxxing-victim-investigation-kit — broker chains before platform tickets.
- bundle NCII leak metadata with sextortion-ncii-investigation-kit — threat channel + platform report rows, not media replay.
- parse stripe/paypal/square closure notices the creator received — payment-processor-subpoena-response-normalizer-*.
- run provenance + ela on leaked files the creator already holds — hashes and timestamps, not content judgment.
- correlate impersonation accounts with multi-source-entity-resolver where public records permit.
- physical safety or account recovery → CCRI 1-844-878-2274 or SWOP referral before deep forensics.
the path
opsec → hash exports → doxxing scope → ncii/coercion metadata → processor notices → provenance on held files → entity resolution → bundle for counsel. fansly/manyvids/chaturbate-specific parsers and sex-worker doxxing-broker detector are on the atlas BUILD backlog — this path uses tools on disk today.
1. evidence manifest generator
sha-256 inventory of leak files, dm exports, processor emails, and platform notices.why first: takedown and counsel packets cross platforms — hash before anyone forwards a folder.
2. doxxing victim investigation kit
paste-site and republish-chain triage when PII is already public.why second: sex-worker-targeted doxxing often hits brokers before platform abuse tickets.
3. sextortion ncii investigation kit
extortion messages, payment demands, and platform report metadata — NCII package without media replay.why third: leak + coercion threads share the same preservation window as NCII takedowns.
4. sextortion takedown notice package generator
structured takedown notice drafts from documented urls and timestamps the creator supplies.why fourth: counsel needs notice-shaped output — not ad-hoc screenshots in email.
5. payment processor subpoena response normalizer (stripe)
stripe closure and dispute exports when the creator lost payouts.why fifth: deplatforming notices are often the first paper trail creators still hold.
6. payment processor subpoena response normalizer (paypal)
paypal limitation and resolution-center shaped exports in parallel.why sixth: many creators split stripe and paypal — parse both sides.
7. ai generated image provenance analyzer
file metadata on leaked stills — synthetic vs scraped vs authentic capture indicators.why seventh: impersonation and composite leaks need provenance, not moral review of pixels.
8. case report generator
bundle hashed exports and finding summaries for counsel or advocate handoff.why last: one timeline pdf for attorneys who were not in the export pull.
common false leads
- treating this as generic online doxxing without NCII and processor-closure context — creator cases often need both broker chains and payout notices.
- using stalkerware sweep before consent triage on the creator's own device — wrong order when the question is leak metadata, not covert apk hunt.
- conflating with adult sextortion payment tracing only — creator safety cases often center on IP ownership and platform notices, not btc peel chains alone.
- attempting to identify anonymous subscribers from tip exports — out of scope and not supported here.
what we can tell you, what we can't
we can tell you:
- sha-256 manifest for leak files and platform exports the creator holds
- doxxing broker propagation and republish timestamps
- processor closure notice fields in stripe/paypal/square shaped exports
- provenance and ela signals on image files without uploading media to a server
we can't tell you:
- whether a platform will restore an account or remove a repost — platform policy, not forensics
- identify anonymous clients or subscribers from payment metadata
- upload creator content to fatcousin servers — processing is browser-local only
- guarantee civil judgment, criminal prosecution, or DMCA outcome
handing it off
- counsel: evidence manifest + takedown notice package + case report pdf + processor finding exports.
- CCRI / advocate: url list + timestamps + hashes — coordinate removal strategy outside this tool.
- law enforcement (when creator consents): hashed exports on encrypted media — beyond this page's chain-of-custody scope.
case type: creator safety · related: online doxxing · cyberstalking · compare case types →